The short answer: a failed backflow test means at least one part of the assembly, a check valve, the relief valve or the air inlet, missed its pass line when the tester put a gauge on it. By itself, a failed reading does not show that backflow happened. It does start a clock. California's state handbook gives 30 days from notification of the failure to repair or replace the assembly. Round Rock, Texas, Athens-Clarke County, Georgia, and Manatee County, Florida, also give 30 days. One Colorado district gives 60. Then the assembly has to pass a retest, and the passing report has to reach the utility. The fix is usually smaller than owners fear: one Florida city's fact sheet says a failed assembly often only needs to be cleaned.
Gauge readings and pass lines are in how backflow testing works; prices are in the backflow testing cost guide. Each rule below is quoted from the state or utility that set it, and your own notice has the final word.
Do these three things this week. (1) Get a copy of the failed test report and find the deadline on the utility's letter or online notice. (2) Ask the tester whether they can repair the assembly and retest it, and whether they will file both reports. (3) If parts are on order or the job turns into a replacement that needs a permit, call the utility before the deadline, not after it. California, for example, allows extensions only if the water system's own plan includes them.
What "failed" means on your report
The test checks each part of the assembly separately, so the report tells you which one failed, and each kind of failure points to a different likely cause. Texas' Form TCEQ-20700, for example, has a box for each reading on the initial test, a row for "Repairs and Materials Used," and a row for the "Test After Repair."
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Cross-Connection Control Manual explains the usual causes. On the reduced pressure (RP) assembly: "If water exits the relief valve, in all likelihood, the first check valve is fouled and it is impractical to proceed with the testing until the valve is serviced." On check valves in general: "all valves may leak as a result of wear or obstruction."
| What the report shows | Which part failed | What the sources say is commonly behind it | Usual next step |
|---|---|---|---|
| RP: relief valve discharging before the test gauge is hooked up | Often the No. 1 check, not the relief valve | EPA manual: water from the relief valve means "in all likelihood, the first check valve is fouled" | Clean or service the first check, then retest |
| RP: relief valve opened too low, or "did not open" | Relief valve | Wear or obstruction of a valve (EPA); damaged rubber parts (Wilton Manors fact sheet) | Clean, replace rubber parts, retest |
| Double check: check No. 1 or No. 2 "leaked" or held below the pass line | That check valve | Debris on the check (EPA: "fouled by debris"); wear | Clean the check and seat, replace rubber parts, retest |
| PVB or SVB: air inlet did not open, or the check held too little | Air inlet or check valve | Wear or obstruction (EPA); long idle periods (Southington, Connecticut, says idle devices "are more prone to failures") | Clean or rebuild, retest |
| Cracked body, split valve, water spraying from the housing | The assembly body or a shutoff valve | Freezing: Salt Lake City says frozen water "can cause internal damage or possible crack the device or valve" | Damage to the body is a reason to replace (Wilton Manors); see the repair or replace section |
| Readings fine, but the tester marked the installation wrong | Installation, not the valves | Wrong orientation, height or location for the rules that apply | Reinstall or relocate, then test again |
Sources: EPA Cross-Connection Control Manual (2003); Wilton Manors, FL, fact sheet (updated 04-09-24); Southington, CT, FAQ; Salt Lake City winterizing guide. Your tester's findings come first.
The USC Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research (USC FCCCHR), whose manual the state rules point to, wrote in 1994 that failing a field test "does not directly correlate" with backflow happening; a failure means the assembly "may need repair." Your utility still treats it as a failure.
Why assemblies fail: the causes the sources name
The causes in official sources come down to dirt, wear, idleness and frost.
Debris from the water main
Check valves seal rubber against a seat, and grit keeps them from closing tight. The EPA manual says the spring loading on a double check's valves lets them "'bite' through small debris and still seal." Its model cross-connection program for water departments says main repairs, main breaks, fires and the "periodic cleaning and flushing of mains" may "'stir up' debris within the water main that will cause fouling of backflow devices installed without the benefit of strainers," and "strongly recommends" strainers immediately upstream on new retrofit installations of RP and double check assemblies.
Worn rubber parts and springs
"Backflow prevention assemblies are mechanical devices that have moving parts that can wear out and fail," says the City of Sacramento. Southington's water department says a backflow preventer "is prone to wear and tear." One utility in our directory turns this into a rule: the Athens-Clarke County Cross Connection Control Manual says "All rubber parts shall be replaced at no less than five (5) year intervals," whether or not the device fails.
Devices that sit idle
Southington's FAQ says backflow preventers "that do not have water turned on to them for a long period of time are more prone to failures." That is common on irrigation systems that stay off most of the year. Seasonal shutdowns and testing are covered in our irrigation backflow testing guide.
Freezing
Colorado State University Extension says backflow prevention devices "will be damaged by freezing during the winter unless they are drained of all water." Salt Lake City's guide adds that frozen water in the device or its ball valves "can cause internal damage or possible crack the device or valve."
How often assemblies fail: one city's numbers
In the one set of local numbers we could check, failure was the exception. Oregon Health Authority's Drinking Water Services collects a yearly cross-connection Annual Summary Report from water systems, with counts of assemblies tested, passed and failed by type. The City of Wilsonville's 2024 report is one example. The table gives its counts as printed; the chart shows the share of tested assemblies that failed, which we computed from those counts.
| Assembly type (as the report groups them) | Installed | Tested | Passed | Failed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reduced pressure (RP, RPBA, RPDA) | 462 | 410 | 399 | 11 |
| Double check (DC, DCVA, DCDA) | 5,057 | 4,606 | 4,541 | 65 |
| Pressure vacuum breaker (PVB, PVBA, SVBA) | 40 | 35 | 33 | 2 |
Source: Wilsonville 2024 Annual Summary Report to the Oregon Health Authority, questions 10 to 12 (Internet Archive copy, captured January 18, 2026).
Show the numbers
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Pressure vacuum breakers (PVB, PVBA, SVBA) | 5.7 % of assemblies tested | 2 failed of 35 tested |
| Reduced pressure assemblies (RP, RPBA, RPDA) | 2.7 % of assemblies tested | 11 failed of 410 tested |
| Double check assemblies (DC, DCVA, DCDA) | 1.4 % of assemblies tested | 65 failed of 4,606 tested |
One city, one year, not a national rate. The report prints counts, not shares: we computed each bar as failed ÷ tested from those counts (shown in the notes and in the table above). The PVB figure rests on only 35 tests. Source: Oregon Health Authority, Drinking Water Services, 2024 Annual Summary Report, Cross Connection & Backflow Prevention, City of Wilsonville (received Mar 19, 2025), questions 10-12; Internet Archive copy of the official URL captured January 18, 2026, accessed 2026-11-04.
That is one city's year, not a national rate, and the PVB figure rests on only 35 tests. Still, most tested assemblies passed.
Your deadline: what each rule says
No national rule sets the repair time. Some state rules set a number; others leave it to the utility.
| State or utility | Time to repair or replace | Reporting and retest | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| California (state policy, all public water systems) | "within 30 days of notification of the failure"; extensions only "if included as part of the Cross-Connection Control Plan" | Test after repair is required; the water system keeps three calendar years of results, "including the name, test date, repair date" | CCCPH 3.3.3(e), 3.3.3(a), 3.5.1 |
| Texas (state rule) | No number in 30 TAC 290.44; set by your utility | Signed and dated original report goes to the water supplier; records kept at least three years | 30 TAC 290.44(h)(4); TCEQ-20700 |
| Round Rock, TX | 30 days "to have the device repaired and retested" | Reports for existing and replacement devices go through the city's online system | Round Rock backflow program |
| Houston, TX | Not stated; "Any missing or damaged parts must be immediately replaced or fixed" | "your location remains out of compliance until a passing test report is submitted" | Houston Public Works |
| Corpus Christi, TX | Not stated in the tester packet | Failed reports are filed like passing ones, within 10 calendar days; if parts are ordered, "a separate test report" confirms compliance | Tester registration packet DSD-1010 |
| Galveston, TX | Not stated in the tester sheet | Tester tells the customer, waits if parts are on order, then files the failed and passing tests "in the same test report" | Galveston backflow registration (Feb. 25, 2026) |
| Irving, TX | Not stated on the page | Customer "must be notified that the assembly requires repair or replacement and retesting"; reports online within 10 days; "no fee for failed test reports" | Irving cross connections page |
| Washington (state rule) | No number in the rule; the purveyor must ensure a failing assembly is "reinstalled, repaired, overhauled, or replaced" | Test "upon installation, repair, reinstallation, or relocation"; more frequent testing allowed "for assemblies that repeatedly fail" | WAC 246-290-490(7)(b), (7)(f) |
| Ohio (state rule) | No number; preventers "shall be repaired, overhauled or replaced at the expense of the consumer whenever they are found to be defective" | Test at installation or repair; the consumer keeps the records "and made available to the supplier of water" | OAC 3745-95-06(C) |
| Athens-Clarke County, GA | 30 days after the first notice; then 10 days on a second notice, or service is terminated | Test after the repair; reports "immediately forwarded" to the county's office | Cross Connection Control Manual (2025) |
| Manatee County, FL | "repaired or replaced and re-certified within 30 days" | Repair by "an authorized plumber on the County's Testers List" | County notice explainer (Aug. 26, 2025) |
| Copper Mountain Consolidated Metropolitan District, CO | 60 days; service suspended if not corrected within 120 days | District must be notified "within 10 days of any failed backflow test" | District regulation update (effective May 1, 2025) |
| Southington, CT | 30 days to correct a failed test | Utility retests after you notify it of the repair, "free of charge" | Southington Water Department FAQ |
Several utilities in our directory, among them EBMUD, Marin Water and Sacramento, do not print a repair window on their program pages. They are California public water systems, and the state handbook puts the 30-day duty on them. Their plans may allow extensions; ask before you need one.
For Ohio utilities such as Columbus, the state rule gives no number, so the deadline is the one printed on the utility's notice. Ask the office named on the letter if it is not printed.
The retest and the paperwork
The repair is half the job. The other half is a passing test on file at the utility.
- One form or two. TCEQ's form puts the initial test, the repairs and the "Test After Repair" on one sheet when the same licensed tester does all of it. "Any follow-up testing performed by a different tester must be documented on a separate form." If you change testers after a failure, expect two reports.
- Parts on order. Utilities disagree on what the tester does while waiting. Corpus Christi wants the failed report filed within 10 calendar days and a separate report when the device passes. Galveston asks testers to wait and enter both tests in one report, which "will keep us from sending letters for a failed test unnecessarily to the customer." Ask your tester which way your utility works.
- Parts must match. TCEQ's form says: "USE ONLY MANUFACTURER'S REPLACEMENT PARTS." California says approved assemblies "must not be modified."
- Keep your copy. Ohio puts record-keeping on the property owner, and Irving requires testers to give the customer "A copy of the backflow test form (not just the invoice)."
Repair or replace?
The sources lean firmly toward repair. The City of Wilton Manors, Florida, tells owners that approved assemblies "are designed to last from 20 to 50 years" and "should not be replaced unless parts are no longer available or if the assembly has sustained damage to the body." For assemblies 2 inches and smaller, it says, the initial test, a cleaning, new rubber parts and a final test "can be accomplished in one hour."
Four triggers for replacement recur in the sources:
- No parts. Washington requires an unlisted assembly to be replaced by an approved one when it "Cannot be repaired using spare parts from the original manufacturer." EBMUD says devices installed earlier with its approval "may continue to be tested until such time as they are no longer repairable and then will be required to upgrade to current standards."
- Damage to the body. Wilton Manors names body damage as a reason to replace, and freezing is one way bodies crack (Salt Lake City, CSU Extension).
- The wrong device for the hazard. Washington's rule puts assemblies "not commensurate with the degree of hazard" on the same footing as failing ones; a repair cannot turn the wrong device into the right one. In California, "Sites with an auxiliary water supply" are on the handbook's list of high-hazard premises that need an air gap or an RP, and EBMUD names "a well or source of auxiliary water" among the conditions that may call for a device. The handbook's note on that line lets an existing double check installed before July 1, 2024, stay only if, among other conditions, it "passes all field tests in the assembly testing and repair timeframe" in the utility's plan, and adds: "An AG, RP, or both is required for all new or replacement assembly installations after July 1, 2024." The handbook does not name private wells, and the same appendix lets a water system "reduce or increase the minimum protection required" after a hazard reassessment. So if your California property has a well and its old double check has to be replaced, ask the water system before ordering whether the replacement must be an RP or an air gap, as that note points to.
- Moving it. Washington requires an unlisted assembly to be replaced if it "Is moved." California, Washington and Houston also require a test after relocation.
When you replace, the new device has to meet today's rules, not the ones in force when the old one went in. Ohio says that when containment backflow preventers are replaced, the new ones must meet the rule's current requirements "at the time of installation." California requires each replaced or newly installed PVB, SVB, double check and RP to be approved under the USC FCCCHR Tenth Edition standards or the ASSE standards it lists with "the 1YT mark." It also requires a replaced RP to sit at least 12 inches and, unless the water system approves otherwise, no more than 36 inches above grade. Double checks installed or replaced since the handbook's adoption follow the same rule unless the water system finds no alternative, so an old double check in a pit may have to come up into the air.
Replacement also brings paperwork. Irving tells testers that "Verification of a plumbing permit is necessary for any newly replaced or installed assembly before testing," and wants the old serial number on the report. Houston asks owners to have their plumber, engineer or testing company email it a Backflow Prevention Assembly Removal Form where an assembly has been replaced, removed or duplicated. A replacement also needs its own passing test: California requires it after installation, as do Houston and Washington.
Decision table
| Your situation | Likely path | What the sources say |
|---|---|---|
| A check or relief valve failed; the body is sound and parts exist | Repair: clean, replace rubber parts, retest | Wilton Manors: replace only if parts are unavailable or the body is damaged |
| RP discharging from the relief valve at the start of the test | Service the first check first | EPA: "in all likelihood, the first check valve is fouled" |
| Parts on order, deadline approaching | Call the utility; ask how the tester should file | Corpus Christi: separate report later; Galveston: one report; California: extensions only if in the plan |
| Manufacturer parts no longer made | Replace with a currently approved assembly | WAC 246-290-490(5)(c) (unlisted assemblies); EBMUD: upgrade when "no longer repairable" |
| Body or valve cracked by frost | Replace, then protect from freezing | Wilton Manors (body damage); Salt Lake City and CSU (freeze damage) |
| California property with a well, old double check fails and can't be fixed | Ask the water system whether the replacement must be an RP or air gap; install it above grade | CCCPH Appendix D item 8 and note (+-+), which do not name wells; 3.3.2(b), (c) |
| The same assembly fails year after year | Expect more frequent testing; consider replacement or a strainer | WAC 246-290-490(7)(b)(ii); CCCPH 3.3.3(b); EPA model program on strainers |
| Fire line assembly in Texas failed | Use a tester employed by an Approved Fireline Contractor | 30 TAC 290.44(h)(4) |
| Irrigation system you no longer use | Ask the utility about removing the device and providing an air gap instead of repairing | Southington: remove the device and "provide an air gap" |
Who may do the repair
Being allowed to test is not always being allowed to repair; inside a building, plumbing licensing can decide it.
- Texas. State rules say licensed backflow prevention assembly testers "are qualified to test and repair assemblies on any domestic, commercial, industrial, or irrigation service." Fire lines are the exception: testers may work on them "only if they are permanently employed by an Approved Fireline Contractor" (30 TAC 290.44(h)(4)). Houston, Round Rock and Galveston are all under this rule; see the Texas tester lists.
- Washington. The Department of Health's requirements sheet (331-680, November 5, 2021) says testing needs a DOH backflow assembly tester (BAT) certificate. Repair inside a home needs plumbing contractor registration and a PL01, PL02 or PL30 plumber certificate (PL01 or PL30 in commercial buildings); outside buildings, contractor registration under RCW 18.27 or 18.106. State law says testers "who maintain or repair backflow assemblies, devices, or air gaps inside a building are subject to certification under chapter 18.106 RCW" (RCW 70A.120.170).
- Athens-Clarke County, Georgia. Its manual says assemblies "are to be installed by a licensed plumber and repairs made by a licensed Master Plumber." See the Athens-Clarke list.
- California. Marin Water's tester list warns that "State law requires that any plumbing work exceeding $500 must be completed by a licensed contractor," and marks the testers who hold a contractor license. The Contractors State License Board's bulletin of December 31, 2024, says the minor-work exemption rose from $500 to $1,000 on January 1, 2025, "but there is a catch: the work cannot require a permit," and the unlicensed person cannot employ anyone. A repair that needs a permit needs a licensed contractor whatever it costs. A replacement in a city that requires a permit falls in that group.
- Southington, Connecticut. The utility does the testing itself but "will not repair any failed device"; having it repaired is the homeowner's job.
- Ohio. The state rule makes repair the consumer's expense but does not say who may do it. Ask your water supplier before hiring.
Whoever repairs, the retest has to come from a tester your utility accepts, which is why our backflow tester directory copies each utility's own list. Holland, Michigan, for example, says testing there "must be performed by a Plumbing or Mechanical Contractor who is certified by the State Plumbing Board."
If the deadline passes
California requires each public water system to have legal authority to "deny or discontinue water service," to "install, inspect, field test, and/or maintain" the assembly itself, or to otherwise address a failure to comply. Washington lists "Denying or discontinuing water service" among a purveyor's corrective actions, after notice to "the authority having jurisdiction" except in an emergency.
What that looks like locally:
- The utility does the work and bills you. In Round Rock, a device not tested in the allotted time is tested by the city, and if that test fails, "the actual cost of the repairs and the retest will be applied to the owner's water bill."
- A second, shorter notice, then shut-off. Athens-Clarke County gives "ten (10) days to comply with the notice or the water service will be terminated," and its manual says "a reconnection fee can be established."
- Fines. Houston warns of "citations being issued with fines of up to $2,000 per day and the risk of potential suspension of water services." Copper Mountain lists "Failure to repair or replace a faulty backflow assembly within 60 days" as a violation, says non-compliance "may result in monthly penalty fees of $1000 per violation," and suspends service if the problem is not corrected within 120 days.
- Termination and restoration charges. EBMUD says non-compliance "will result in your water service being discontinued and fines being imposed," and its fee schedule has a $784 charge where service "has been terminated for failure to meet the District's Backflow Program requirements." Marin Water says non-compliance "can result in termination of water service." Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District lists a $200 "Backflow noncompliance turn off/on" fee for 2026.
More fees are compared in the cost guide.
If the tester sees actual backflow. California requires testers to notify the water system "as soon as possible within 24 hours" if they see a backflow incident or an unprotected cross-connection during a test. If a backflow incident is confirmed, the water system must "discontinue service to the user premises," and service is not restored until it receives "a passing BPA field test" and the assembly is protecting the system. If you suspect contaminated water in your building, call the utility right away and ask it and your health department whether to keep using the water.
Worked examples
Each example uses only rules quoted above.
A Round Rock homeowner whose sprinkler PVB fails on the check valve. The city gives 30 days to repair and retest. Texas lets the licensed tester do the repair, so cleaning or new rubber parts and a retest on one visit can close it out, with the report filed online. Decision table row 1.
An EBMUD customer with a private well whose old double check fails, and the parts are no longer made. EBMUD lets older approved devices stay "until such time as they are no longer repairable." This one isn't, so it must be upgraded. EBMUD's page names "a well or source of auxiliary water" together, and the handbook's note on such sites calls for "An AG, RP, or both" in replacement installations, so the owner should ask the district whether the new device must be an RP or an air gap before ordering it. A replaced RP or double check goes at least 12 inches above grade and, unless the district approves otherwise, no more than 36. California's 30-day window applies, so the owner should ask about an extension before ordering the work. Decision table rows 4 and 6.
A Houston restaurant whose RP discharges from the relief valve at the start of the test. The EPA manual points to a fouled first check. The site stays out of compliance "until a passing test report is submitted." If the assembly is on the fire line, the tester must work for an Approved Fireline Contractor. Decision table rows 2 and 8.
Restaurants, commercial buildings and property managers
Keeping water on during repairs. The EPA's model program says parallel installation of two devices "is an effective means of the owner insuring that uninterrupted water service during testing or repair of devices." The same model program says "High hazard situations will not be allowed to continue unprotected if the backflow preventer fails the test and cannot be repaired immediately," and sets 30 days for other situations. That is a model for water departments, not a federal rule.
Next step
Find your utility in the backflow tester directory (or start at the Texas or California lists) and book a tester who can repair and retest before the date on your notice. If the job grows into a replacement, ask the utility about the permit and the deadline on the same call. Once the passing report is filed, ask the utility to confirm it has it.
Questions people ask
How long do I have to fix a failed backflow test?
Can the backflow tester repair the device, or do I need a plumber?
Should I repair or replace a failed backflow preventer?
What happens if I miss the repair deadline?
Does a failed test get reported to the water utility?
Why does my backflow preventer keep failing?
Is my water unsafe because the backflow test failed?
- California State Water Resources Control Board, Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (adopted December 19, 2023; effective July 1, 2024; amended April 21, 2026), sections 3.1.3, 3.3.1-3.3.3, 3.5.1 and Appendix D (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Texas Administrative Code, 30 TAC § 290.44, Water Distribution, subsection (h) Backflow, siphonage (via Cornell LII; last amended by 48 TexReg 7585, December 15, 2023) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Form TCEQ-20700 Backflow Prevention Assembly Test and Maintenance Report, with instructions (Revision 04-04-2019) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Washington Administrative Code, WAC 246-290-490, Cross-connection control requirements (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Washington State Department of Health, Backflow Assembly Testing Requirements, publication 331-680 (11/5/2021) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Revised Code of Washington, RCW 70A.120.170, Certification of backflow assembly testers and cross-connection control specialists (certified 7/12/2024) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Ohio Administrative Code 3745-95-06, Backflow preventers (via Cornell LII; effective 10/10/2022; text confirmed on the Internet Archive copy listed next) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Ohio Administrative Code 3745-95-06, Backflow preventers: Internet Archive copy of the official codes.ohio.gov page, captured 2026-06-08 (page shows effective date October 10, 2022) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- U.S. EPA, Cross-Connection Control Manual (EPA 816-R-03-002, February 2003), including Chapter Seven, Cross Connection Control Model Program (accessed 2026-11-04)
- USC Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research, Cross Talk, Vol. 12 No. 2 (July 1994): Failing the Field Test (accessed 2026-11-04)
- City of Wilton Manors, FL, Backflow Assembly Tests Fact Sheet (updated 04-09-24) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- City of Sacramento Department of Utilities, Cross-Connection Control (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Southington Water Department (Connecticut), Frequently Asked Questions on Residential Backflow Testing (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities, Winterizing Your Lawn Sprinkler System and Backflow Preventer (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Colorado State University Extension, Home Sprinkler Systems: Backflow Prevention Devices (published April 2003, reviewed August 2025) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Oregon Health Authority, Drinking Water Services, 2024 Annual Summary Report, Cross Connection & Backflow Prevention, City of Wilsonville (received Mar 19, 2025): Internet Archive copy of the official URL, captured January 18, 2026 (accessed 2026-11-04)
- City of Round Rock Utilities and Environmental Services, Backflow Prevention (page modified June 29, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Houston Public Works, Cross Connection Control Program (accessed 2026-11-04)
- City of Corpus Christi Development Services, Backflow Prevention / Cross-Connection Control Program tester registration packet, Form DSD-1010 (Rev. 10/2025) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- City of Galveston Building Division, City of Galveston Backflow Registration (dated February 25, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- City of Irving, Cross Connections + Backflow (accessed 2026-11-04)
- East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), Backflow prevention (accessed 2026-11-04)
- EBMUD, Schedule C - Charges for Special Services (effective 7/1/2026), section G, Backflow Program Charges (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Marin Water, Backflow prevention (page modified February 23, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Marin Water, List of certified backflow testers (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Contractors State License Board (California), Industry Bulletin #24-07: License Requirement for Minor Work Increases from $500 to $1,000 (December 31, 2024) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Athens-Clarke County, Cross Connection Control Manual (2025) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Manatee County Utilities (Florida), Did you receive a letter about your backflow preventer? (August 26, 2025) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Copper Mountain Consolidated Metropolitan District (Colorado), Notice of Updated Backflow Regulations (effective May 1, 2025) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District, Regulations Governing Water Service, Part 5 Appendix A: Water Service Charges, Deposits, and Miscellaneous Fees (amended 12/10/2025, Resolution 2025-41) (accessed 2026-11-04)
- Holland Board of Public Works (Michigan), State of Michigan Certified Backflow Device Testers list (accessed 2026-11-04)