No federal agency, state agency or extension service we found publishes a national price for a drilled well. The most detailed official number comes from California's State Water Resources Control Board: in its current cost model it prices a new 500-foot domestic well at $65 per foot to drill, or $32,500, and about $46,180 once the pump, casing, wiring, tank, parts, labor, a water test and destroying the old well are added. County permits ($90 to $5,939 in its survey) come on top. That well is deeper than most, because the model is built for drought areas. And a new well isn't finished when the rig leaves: at least eight states require a lab test of a new well, several of them before anyone uses the water, and the sample is taken only after the well has been disinfected and flushed.
Short answer. Depth, casing, pump and wiring make up most of the bill, and only a few public sources put dollar figures on them, all from one state or one program. Get itemized written bids, which is what Penn State Extension and the Minnesota Department of Health advise. Then budget for the step most cost pages skip: a certified-lab test of the disinfected, flushed well before anyone drinks the water.
Well types are compared in how a private well works; how much water a new well delivers is in our well flow test guide.
How much does a drilled well cost?
The top search results for "drilled well cost" (checked November 3, 2026) are home-improvement and referral sites. The one we could open, Bob Vila's, quotes other commercial guides and mentions no state new-well testing rule. We don't repeat those numbers. Below are the only official figures we found, with dates and limits.
Two of the agencies we checked don't give a price at all. Penn State Extension's guide to drilling a new well (updated May 13, 2022) lists an "Itemized cost estimate" among the things a contract needs. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Well Owner's Handbook (fourth edition, updated January 2014) says to "begin by getting estimates or bids from more than one licensed well contractor" and to have "a written agreement with the contractor listing in detail the materials and services to be provided."
California's model: a 500-foot replacement well
California's State Water Board estimates the cost of a new private well for households whose wells are at high risk of running dry. Its 2024 supplemental appendix on long-term solutions (last updated June 2024) lists every line. The board says the cost figures were "developed in 2023" from projects it funded and from outside quotes. Its Needs Assessment page says the 2025 and 2026 assessments did not update the cost model, so these remain the current figures.
Show the numbers
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Well drilling (500 ft at $65/ft) | 32,500 US dollars | |
| Additional parts and labor | 3,500 US dollars | |
| Destroy old well | 3,300 US dollars | |
| Submersible wire (500 ft at $5/ft) | 2,500 US dollars | |
| Connection/casing pipe | 2,150 US dollars | |
| Pump and motor (domestic well) | 830 US dollars | |
| Electrical component and control box | 600 US dollars | |
| Pressurized water tank | 400 US dollars | |
| Water sampling | 400 US dollars |
State Water Board cost model (figures developed in 2023, still current in 2026). Our sum: $46,180 before the county permit, a regional multiplier and 3.1% inflation. The model assumes a deeper-than-typical well for drought areas. Source: California State Water Resources Control Board, Drinking Water Needs Assessment, Supplemental Appendix: Additional Long-Term Modeled Solutions Cost Estimate Methodology (last updated June 2024), Table 19 and Equation 7, accessed 2026-11-03.
Read the assumptions before you borrow the totals:
- Depth. The model assumes a well 500 feet deep, 4 to 6 inches across. The board says that "is deeper than typical private wells," because the households it models are in areas where drought and water shortage "require deeper wells."
- Drilling. The board uses a flat $32,500 ($65 a foot times 500 feet). It took that from a 2023 quote by a California driller, close to the $31,250 average drilling cost its contractor gathered from board-funded projects that year.
- Total. The board's equation adds the drilling to the other items in the chart. Their sum is $46,180 (our arithmetic). The county permit fee goes on top, then a regional multiplier (0% rural, +30% suburban, +32% urban) and 3.1% for inflation.
- What's missing. The model does not include a flow test, treatment or a new water line to the house.
USDA payment rates for farm wells
The US Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) pays farmers part of the cost of a well through the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), under conservation practice 642, Water Well. These are the only USDA well figures we found, with two caveats. First, the practice is for farm water. NRCS's practice standard (we read Kentucky's 2021 version) says it "does not apply to" wells "constructed for domestic or public water supply," or to pumps. Second, the rates are payments, not prices. Under 7 CFR 1466.23, payment for a practice may not exceed "Seventy-five percent of the estimated costs incurred by implementing the conservation practice" in most cases, or up to 90 percent for historically underserved producers and some priority practices.
Even so, they show how NRCS expects cost to rise with well size. From the West Virginia EQIP payment schedule for fiscal year 2026 (standard rates, not the higher rates for historically underserved producers):
| Practice 642 scenario (West Virginia, FY2026) | Base payment, per well | Plus, per linear foot |
|---|---|---|
| Typical well, 4-inch diameter | $4,714.94 | $56.77 |
| Typical well, 6-inch diameter | $5,069.44 | $72.44 |
| Typical well, 8-inch diameter | $7,745.72 | $63.26 |
| Typical well, 10-inch diameter | $8,922.16 | $115.18 |
| Steel or copper, 100 feet deep or more | None listed | $54.30 |
| Dug well | $17,181.71 each | None listed |
NRCS says on its West Virginia payment schedule page that it re-evaluates each practice every year against "the current costs for material and labor within the state," and that "The updated payment schedule is released in the first quarter each Fiscal Year (Oct-Dec)." Each state sets its own rates, so treat this as one state's snapshot.
Drilled vs dug well cost
We found no official price for a household dug or bored well. The NRCS table above has one farm figure: a flat $17,181.71 payment for a dug well in West Virginia. The bigger question is whether a dug well is allowed at all. MDH says dug, bored and drive-point wells "are often less than 50 feet deep, and are more likely to be contaminated by surface water, sewage from septic systems, or chemical spills," and that "Many of the techniques used in the past for constructing dug or bored wells are not sanitary and are no longer legal under the state rules." Minnesota does let a property owner install a drive-point well (a "sand point") without a notification fee, as MDH's page on constructing a new well (updated October 18, 2024) explains.
So "drilled vs dug" is about protection as much as price: a shallow dug well may be cheaper to build, but it can be illegal where you live and easier to contaminate. Our types of wells table compares depths and contamination risk using EPA, USGS and MDH figures.
What drives the cost of a new well
Every major line item, with the official figure we found or a note that none exists. The figures come from different states and years; they show what matters, not what your well will cost.
| Cost driver | What the official sources say | Official dollar figure? |
|---|---|---|
| Depth | California prices drilling per foot and assumes 500 feet where drought forces deeper wells. | $65/ft (California, 2023 quote) |
| Diameter | NRCS's per-foot rate for a 10-inch farm well is about double the 4-inch rate. | $56.77 to $115.18/ft (West Virginia NRCS payment rates, FY2026) |
| Casing | California budgets a single line for casing and connection pipe. NRCS lists a separate per-foot rate for a "Steel or Copper, Deeper Than or Equal to 100 Feet" well scenario. | $2,150 (California; quotes ran $1,800 to $2,500); $54.30/ft (West Virginia NRCS) |
| Geology and drilling method | No official household figure. See the Minnesota note below the table. | None found for household wells |
| Pump, wiring, controls, tank | California sizes a 0.5-horsepower, 10-gallon-per-minute pump for a domestic well. Wire is priced per foot of depth. | Pump $830, controls $600, tank $400, wire $5/ft (California) |
| Permit or notification | Set by the county or the state; see the next section. | $90 to $5,939 by county (California, 2021 survey); $325 (Minnesota) |
| Sealing the old well | California treats destroying the old well as a key cost of a replacement well and says the owner is responsible for it. | $3,300 (California); Minnesota sealing notification $125 |
| First water test | California budgets the top of the $100 to $400 range its GAMA program gives for basic sampling. | $400 (California); $151 for Vermont's state-lab new-well kits |
| Flow test, treatment, water line to the house | Penn State lists "Estimate of well yield" and "Delivery of well log and pump test results" as contract items. | None found |
The Minnesota note. One official table shows how much drilling method can matter. Minnesota Rules 2890.3500 (published December 12, 2025) sets the most Minnesota's petroleum tank release program will reimburse for installing small wells during spill investigations. Those are not drinking-water wells. For a 4-inch well up to 25 feet deep, the cap is $2,396 using a hollow-stem auger in "sand, silt, or clay" and $3,988 using mud or air rotary in "limestone or hard rock." The hard-rock cap is about two-thirds higher for the same depth and diameter, though the rotary figure also assumes a steel riser and less sampling.
Water well drilling permits, notification and setbacks
- California: owners need permits "from local environmental health agencies (often County agency) or local water districts before construction can take place," the State Water Board says. Its 2021 phone survey of county permit offices found replacement-well fees from $90 (Modoc County) to $5,939 (San Mateo County).
- Minnesota: the contractor or owner must file a notification form "with the appropriate fee" before drilling a water-supply well. Minnesota Statutes 2026, section 103I.208 sets that fee at $325; the notification fee for sealing a well is $125. MDH notes that some counties and cities run delegated well programs that "may have additional requirements," and these usually require a permit.
Show the numbers
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Modoc | 90 US dollars | |
| Solano | 184 US dollars | |
| Tulare | 447 US dollars | |
| Stanislaus | 615 US dollars | |
| Merced | 894 US dollars | |
| Fresno | 1,287 US dollars | |
| Kern | 2,320 US dollars | |
| Los Angeles | 3,209 US dollars | |
| Monterey | 4,344 US dollars | |
| San Mateo | 5,939 US dollars |
From the State Water Board's 2021 phone survey of county well permitting agencies (replacement-well scenario). Ten of the counties in its table, lowest to highest. Source: California State Water Resources Control Board, Drinking Water Needs Assessment, Supplemental Appendix: Additional Long-Term Modeled Solutions Cost Estimate Methodology (last updated June 2024), Table 20 'Well Permitting Cost Per County', accessed 2026-11-03.
Setbacks shape the layout too. MDH says a well must meet the "minimum isolation distances" in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725. Penn State's suggested distances include at least 50 feet from sewers and septic tanks and 100 feet from absorption fields, cesspools, pastures and barnyards. These are extension recommendations, not a regulation. For the distances FHA and VA lenders check, see our well inspection guide. To look up the permit or well log of a well that already exists on a property, see finding well and septic records.
What to put in the driller's contract
Penn State's contract checklist doubles as a list of what you're paying for:
- "Assurance of compliance with regulations" and the driller's liability insurance
- "Casing specifications (minimum of 4 inches to bedrock)"
- "Sanitary well cap and grout seal included"
- "Well development to maximum yield"
- "Disinfection after drilling and pump installation"
- "Itemized cost estimate" and "Estimate of well yield"
- "Delivery of well log and pump test results"
Add who collects the first water sample, which lab tests it, and who pays. Minnesota's rule makes the well's builder see that the sample is collected, and Kentucky's makes the driller report the results. Connecticut's law puts the test on the owner.
New well disinfection: why the first sample waits
Germs can get in during construction. MDH: "Every new well must be disinfected after it is drilled and before the water is used for drinking or cooking." That's why the rules make the chlorine go before the sample is taken.
Kentucky's well construction rule, 401 KAR 6:310 (effective January 3, 2020), spells out the sequence. A new well "shall be developed until the column of water in the well is free of visible sediment," then disinfected to at least 100 parts per million chlorine. The chlorinated water must stand for at least 30 minutes before the well is purged. The bacteria "sample shall not be collected until all residual chlorine has been purged from the well."
The Vermont Department of Health (updated March 4, 2026) says the same in one line: "Before you test your water, the well must be disinfected with chlorine, then flushed to remove the chlorine from the water." Rhode Island requires the test to be done "after all plumbing and water-using appliances are in place and the system has been properly disinfected," from "an interior faucet that yields untreated (raw) well water."
Doing it yourself? Our guide to disinfecting a new well covers bleach amounts and safety steps.
State new-well testing rules
These are the state rules we confirmed in their current published form. "Before use" means the source says not to drink the water, or not to use the well for household purposes, until the results are in.
| State and rule | Who tests, and when | Required tests |
|---|---|---|
| Connecticut, General Statutes § 19a-37 (new wells built on or after October 1, 2022) | Owner, through a lab; results go to the local health authority. The well "shall not be used for domestic purposes" until that authority finds the results meet the state's maximum contaminant levels. | Coliform, nitrate, nitrite, sodium, chloride, iron, manganese, hardness, turbidity, pH, sulfate, apparent color, odor, arsenic, uranium; first-draw lead if the well serves an existing building |
| Minnesota, Rules 4725.5650 | The well's builder has the sample collected "Within 30 days of completion and before the use" of the well. No drinking until total coliform is absent and the nitrate and arsenic results are reported. | Total coliform bacteria, nitrate-nitrogen, arsenic |
| Kentucky, 401 KAR 6:310 | Within 30 days of completion, after the chlorine is purged; delivered to a certified lab within 6 hours. The driller gives the owner the results within 60 days. | E. coli |
| North Carolina, DHHS guidance on state law | State lab (book through the local health department) or a state-certified lab, before the well becomes a drinking-water source; tests "should be conducted within 30 days of the well completion." | Bacterial and chemical contaminants |
| Vermont, DEC Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules | Landowner, before using a new or deepened well or spring; disinfect and flush first; all samples from the kitchen cold-water faucet. | E. coli, total coliform, arsenic, fluoride, lead (first draw), manganese, nitrate, nitrite, uranium, gross alpha, chloride, sodium, iron, pH |
| Rhode Island, 216-RICR-50-05-2, § 2.12 | Before a certificate of occupancy, and whenever a new well serves an existing building; after disinfection, from an indoor raw-water tap. | Alkalinity, total coliform and fecal or E. coli, hardness, chloride, fluoride, iron, lead, manganese, nitrate/nitrite, pH, specific conductance, sulfate, total dissolved solids, turbidity, VOCs, MTBE |
| South Dakota, Centennial Environmental Protection Act of 1989 | Every new domestic well drilled in the state. | Bacteria "and several selected chemicals"; the state's result guide explains nitrate, sodium, sulfate and conductivity |
| Wisconsin, NR 812 (DNR fact sheet PUB-DG-088, March 2026) | The well constructor collects the samples "upon completion of each well," from a sampling faucet between the pressure tank and the well, and a certified lab tests them. | Nitrate, coliform bacteria |
Sources for the table: the current Connecticut statute, Minnesota Rules 4725.5650, Kentucky's rule above, the North Carolina DHHS testing FAQ (last modified July 29, 2025; read from the Internet Archive copy of January 18, 2026, because the state server refused the connection), the Vermont page above, the Rhode Island regulation (periodic refile effective January 4, 2022), South Dakota DANR's New Well Sampling Program and Wisconsin DNR's Water Sample Collection fact sheet.
Two more states give advice without a rule. The Arizona Department of Health Services well guide says to test all new wells for arsenic, total coliform bacteria, fluoride, lead, nitrates, total dissolved solids and uranium. Colorado's health department lists a "New well/no known testing" panel that includes PFAS and a VOC screen. Your local health department can tell you whether a county rule adds tests; the state pages list certified labs and each state's own guidance.
What to test first in a new well
Every rule includes bacteria. Most add nitrate, and the longer lists add minerals from the local rock.
- Bacteria (total coliform, E. coli): required in all eight states. South Dakota DANR notes that wells are most often contaminated by surface water entering "around the pump, through the well cover, or through the upper few feet of the well casing." See coliform bacteria.
- Nitrate: required in Connecticut, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Vermont and Rhode Island (nitrite too in Connecticut, Vermont and Rhode Island). See nitrate in well water.
- Arsenic and uranium: both occur naturally in some bedrock. Connecticut lets local health directors require arsenic or uranium tests in areas known for natural deposits in the bedrock. MDH says arsenic "has been detected in about 40 percent of new wells drilled since 2008 in Minnesota," according to its arsenic page (updated October 19, 2026). Connecticut and Vermont require uranium. See arsenic and uranium.
- Lead, first draw: required where a new well feeds existing plumbing (Connecticut) or in every case (Vermont, Rhode Island). The sample is drawn from the plumbing. See lead.
- Sodium, chloride and sulfate: Connecticut requires all three, Vermont sodium and chloride, Rhode Island chloride and sulfate. See salt in well water.
- VOCs and PFAS: Rhode Island requires VOCs and MTBE. Colorado's new-well list includes PFAS and a VOC screen. Neither is on most lists; ask your local health department whether land use near your well calls for them. See VOCs and PFAS.
If your state has no rule, MDH's baseline for every well is a fair starting point: "Two standard tests — for coliform bacteria and nitrate — should be performed regularly on every well." Then add arsenic and uranium where local geology calls for them. The lab finder shows which certified labs near you run each test.
When to take the first sample
- The well is developed. Kentucky requires the water to run free of visible sediment.
- The well is disinfected. In Minnesota, licensed contractors disinfect after construction. Penn State says to make sure it happens "Before the well construction is complete."
- The chlorine is flushed out. Run water until no chlorine remains. Kentucky won't accept a sample until "all residual chlorine has been purged." MDH says to send the chlorinated water away from the septic system.
- The sample goes to a certified lab within the deadline. Minnesota and Kentucky set 30 days from completion, and North Carolina recommends the same. Bacteria bottles have short holding times; Kentucky sets 6 hours. Our sampling guide covers bottles, taps and holding times.
- Nobody drinks the water until the results are back. Connecticut requires them to meet state limits; Minnesota requires coliform to be absent and the nitrate and arsenic results to be reported.
- Test again later. Vermont says to retest "six to 12 months" after installing a new well, because those results "will better represent your long-term water quality." Then move to a regular schedule, covered in how often to test well water.
MDH found that when arsenic shows up in a new well, "the level may increase or decrease in the first few months after construction."
Reading the first results
| What happened | What the sources say to do |
|---|---|
| 1. Coliform bacteria found in the first sample | Disinfect and sample again (MDH). Under Minnesota's rule, the well's builder is responsible for dealing with possible causes, re-disinfecting and resampling. If it keeps failing, MDH says to look for the source and check the well for defects. |
| 2. Arsenic detected in a new Minnesota well | MDH: "you may want to retest your well about six months after construction." MDH also says that if any arsenic is found, consider a treatment unit or another drinking-water source, and above 10 µg/L it "highly recommends" acting; see our arsenic page. |
| 3. New well connected to an existing house | Take a first-draw lead sample from the existing plumbing (Connecticut; Vermont and Rhode Island require first-draw lead for every new well). |
| 4. Connecticut result above a state limit | The well can't be used for domestic purposes until the local health authority finds the results comply. Ask that office what it will accept: a retest, treatment or both. |
| 5. Everything within limits | Retest 6 to 12 months after installation (Vermont), then follow your state's routine schedule. |
Two examples, both illustrative:
Example 1: Minnesota, arsenic 4 µg/L
The driller's report shows no total coliform, nitrate below the reporting limit and arsenic at 4 micrograms per liter. Rules 4725.5650 no longer bars use: coliform is absent, and the nitrate and arsenic results have been reported. This is row 2. Because arsenic was detected, MDH suggests considering treatment or another drinking-water source as well as the six-month retest, since early levels can move either way. Federal arsenic limits apply to public water systems, not private wells; our arsenic page explains what the numbers mean.
Example 2: Connecticut, coliform present
A new well for a new house comes back positive for total coliform. This is rows 1 and 4. The family can't use the well for domestic purposes until the local health authority accepts the results, so the well gets disinfected again and resampled after flushing. If disinfection keeps failing, MDH's advice is to find the source of the contamination and check the well for defects. See how to read a well water test report for the terms on the lab sheet.
Help paying for a new well
State and USDA programs that help pay for replacement wells, repairs and treatment are covered in our guide to well repair grants. For lab prices beyond the first test, see what well water testing costs, and book the first test with a certified lab through the lab finder.
Questions people ask
How much does it cost to drill a well?
Is a dug well cheaper than a drilled well?
Do I need a permit to drill a well?
Do I have to test a new well before using it?
How long after drilling a well can you drink the water?
What should a new well be tested for?
Does the well driller test the water?
- California State Water Resources Control Board, Drinking Water Needs Assessment, Supplemental Appendix: Additional Long-Term Modeled Solutions Cost Estimate Methodology (last updated June 2024), section New Private Well, Tables 19 and 20, Equation 7 (accessed 2026-11-03)
- California State Water Resources Control Board, Drinking Water Needs Assessment page (2025 and 2026 Needs Assessments do not include an updated Cost Assessment; refers to the 2024 Cost Model) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- California State Water Resources Control Board, GAMA, Domestic Well Testing (page last updated 09/15/2023) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Fiscal Year 2026 Payment Schedule, West Virginia, practice 642 Water Well (STC approved) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, West Virginia Payment Schedule page (FY26 files listed) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Conservation Practice Standard Water Well, Code 642, Kentucky (2021), Field Office Technical Guide (accessed 2026-11-03)
- 7 CFR 1466.23, Environmental Quality Incentives Program, Payments (Cornell LII) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Minnesota Rules 2890.3500, At-grade well installation, chapter 2890 Petroleum Tank Releases (published electronically December 12, 2025) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Minnesota Statutes 2026, section 103I.208, Notification filing fees and permit fees (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Minnesota Department of Health, Constructing a New Water-Supply Well in Minnesota (last updated 10/18/2024) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Minnesota Rules 4725.5650, Water quality samples from newly constructed potable water-supply well (published electronically September 2, 2008; current version) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Minnesota Department of Health, Well Owner's Handbook, fourth edition (updated January 2014) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Minnesota Department of Health, Arsenic in Well Water (last updated 10/19/2026) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Penn State Extension, Drilling a New Well (updated May 13, 2022) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Connecticut General Statutes § 19a-37, subsections (c)(2) and (f) (current, chapter 368a) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Kentucky Legislative Research Commission, 401 KAR 6:310, Water supply well construction practices and standards (eff. Jan 3, 2020), Sections 1 and 9 (accessed 2026-11-03)
- NC Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public Health, Private Wells: Frequently Asked Questions about Testing (last modified July 29, 2025) (read from the Internet Archive capture of January 18, 2026; the state server refused the connection) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Vermont Department of Health, New drilled well testing: what you need to know (last updated March 4, 2026) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Rhode Island Department of Health, 216-RICR-50-05-2 Private Drinking Water Systems (periodic refile effective Jan 4, 2022), section 2.12 and Table 1 (accessed 2026-11-03)
- South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, New Well Sampling Program (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Water Sample Collection, A Fact Sheet for Well Drillers and Pump Installers, PUB-DG-088 (March 2026) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Arizona Department of Health Services, Protect Your Health: a guide for private well owners in Arizona (no date printed) (accessed 2026-11-03)
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (Colorado Environmental Public Health Tracking), Private well water and your health (accessed 2026-11-03)